Wednesday, March 29, 2006 

Sensex Touches 11000 Mark

The Bombay Stock Exchange benchmark Sensex on Tuesday reached the 11,000 milestone and also touched an all-time high of 11,017.25 on sustained buying by funds, but lost some ground to close at 10,905.20.
Positive budget proposals, the Supreme Court's judgement on selling of mill land, robust economic growth, expectations of higher than eight per cent GDP growth and last but not the least, first roadmap to be announced by RBI on capital account convertibility by July end this year, cleared the decks for the Sensex to cross the 11,000-mark, dealers said.
The BSE-30 share sensitive index opened slightly better at 10,945.62 against Monday's close of 10,941.11 and later shot up to the new intra-trade high of 11,017.25. Thereafter, the market turned volatile on alternate bouts of buying and selling during the last hour with profit taking pushing the index to a low of 10,863.61. Later, it closed at 10,905.20. IT shares, which were the favourite with investors on Monday, ran out of steam and some of them finished with losses.
The Sensex took 33 trading sessions to cross over the 11,000 mark after it had crossed the 10,000 mark on February 6.

By hitting the 11,000 mark, the BSE Sensex has joined the exclusive club of leading world market indices like the Dow Jones (USA), Nikkei (Japan) and Hang Seng (Hong Kong) that trade above the 11,000 mark.

Saturday, March 11, 2006 

MCX-Multi Commodity Exchange of India

MCX an independent and de-mutulised multi commodity exchange has permanent recognition from Government of India for facilitating online trading, clearing and settlement operations for commodity futures markets across the country. Key shareholders of MCX include Financial Technologies (I) Ltd., State Bank of India (India’s largest commercial bank) & associates, Fidelity International, National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE), National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), HDFC Bank, SBI Life Insurance Co. Ltd., Union Bank of India, Canara Bank, Bank of India, Bank of Baroda and Corporation Bank.

Headquartered in Mumbai, MCX is led by an expert management team with deep domain knowledge of the commodity futures markets. Through the integration of dedicated resources, robust technology and scalable infrastructure, since inception MCX has recorded many first to its credit.

Inaugurated in November 2003 by Shri Mukesh Ambani, Chairman & Managing Director, Reliance Industries Ltd, MCX offers futures trading in the following commodity categories: Agri Commodities, Bullion, Metals- Ferrous & Non-ferrous, Pulses, Oils & Oilseeds, Energy, Plantations, Spices and other soft commodities.

MCX has built strategic alliances with some of the largest players in commodities eco-system, namely, Bombay Bullion Association, Bombay Metal Exchange, Solvent Extractors' Association of India, Pulses Importers Association, Shetkari Sanghatana, United Planters Association of India and India Pepper and Spice Trade Association.

Today MCX is offering spectacular growth opportunities and advantages to a large cross section of the participants including Producers / Processors, Traders, Corporate, Regional Trading Centers, Importers, Exporters, Cooperatives, Industry Associations, amongst others MCX being nation-wide commodity exchange, offering multiple commodities for trading with wide reach and penetration and robust infrastructure, is well placed to tap this vast potential.

Sunday, March 05, 2006 

GREEN SHOE OPTION

The brief lecture on Green Shoe option was given by our finance faculty Prof. Tapas Sir are as follows:
  • In case an issuer company is making an initial public offer of equity shares through the book building mechanism, the company can avail of the Green Shoe option (GSO) for stabilizing the post listing price of its shares
  • A company desirous of availing the option granted by this Chapter, shall in the resolution of the general meeting authorizing the public issue, seek authorization also for the possibility of allotment of further shares to the ‘stabilizing agent’ (SA) at the end of the stabilization period.
  • The company shall appoint one of the Lead book runners, amongst the issue management team, as the “stabilizing agent” (SA), who will be responsible for the price stabilization process, if required.
  • The SA shall also enter into an agreement with the promoter(s) who will lend their shares, specifying the maximum number of shares that may be borrowed from the promoters, which shall not be in excess of 15% of the total issue size.
  • The details of the agreements shall be disclosed in the Red Herring prospectus and the final prospectus.
  • The Lead Book Runner, in consultation with the SA, shall determine the amount of shares to be over allotted with the public issue.
  • The stabilization mechanism shall be available for the period disclosed by the company in the prospectus, which shall not exceed 30 days from the date when trading permission was given by the exchange(s).
  • The SA shall borrow shares from the promoters of the company to the extent of the proposed over-allotment. These shares shall be in dematerialized form only.
  • The money received from the applicants against the over allotment in the green shoe option shall be kept in the GSO Bank Account, distinct from the issue account and shall be used for the purpose of buying shares from the market, during the stabilization period.
  • The prime responsibility of the SA shall be to stabilize post listing price of the shares. To this end, the SA shall determine the timing of buying the shares, the quantity to be bought, the price at which the shares are to be bought etc.
  • On expiry of the stabilization period, in case the SA does not buy shares to the extent of shares over-allotted by the company from the market, the issuer company shall allot shares to the extent of the shortfall in dematerialized form to the GSO Demat Account, within five days of the closure of the stabilization period. These shares shall be returned to the promoters by the SA in lieu of the shares borrowed from them.

Friday, March 03, 2006 

Budget Update on Financial Sector, ....

BUDGET ESTIMATES 2006-07
• Plan Expenditure: estimated at Rs. 172,728 crore, up by 20.4%.
• Non-Plan Expenditure: estimated at Rs. 391,263 crore, up by 5.5%
• Revenue Deficit: estimated at Rs. 84,727 crore, 2.1% of the GDP.
• Fiscal Deficit: estimated at Rs. 148,686 crore, 3.8% of the GDP.


FINANCIAL SECTOR
• Banking, Insurance and Pensions: net capital support to banking sector stands to be Rs. 22,808 crore, it has to be restructured; Bill on insurance to be introduced in 2006-07.
• Capital Market: limit on FII investment in Government securities to be increased to $2 billion from $1.75 billion; limit to FII investment in corporate debt to be $1.5 billion from $0.5 billion; ceiling on aggregate investment by mutual funds in overseas instruments is to be raised to $2 billion from $1 billion with removal of requirements of 10% reciprocal share holding.

FISCAL CONSOLIDATION
• Twelfth Finance Commission: Rs. 94,402 crore to be released as states' share in gross tax revenues.

SERVICES SECTOR
• Tourism: development of 15 tourist destinations and circuits to be undertaken; 50 villages with core competency in handicrafts and other related work to be identified and developed; 4 new institutes of hotel management to come up in Uttaranchal, Chhattisgarh, Haryana and Jharkhand; plan allocation is increased to Rs. 830 crore from Rs. 786 crore.
• Foreign Trade: the share in exports to be doubled by 2008-09.

INVESTMENT
• Equity support from the Government of Rs. 16,901 crore and loans of Rs. 2,789 crore to Central PSEs, including Railways; to make india a hub for gems and jewelry.

SERVICE TAX

• Service tax rate increased to 12% from 10%.
• New services to be included like ATM operations, maintenance and management, share transfer agents, sale of space or time (other than print media), sponsorship of events (other than sports events), ship management, etc.
• Leasing and hire purchase to be treated as loan transactions.
• Proposal to set April 1, 2010 as the date for introducing Goods and Service Tax (GST).

Monday, February 27, 2006 

History of Options

Ancient Origins: Although it isn't known exactly when the first option contract traded, it is known that the Romans and Phoenicians used similar contracts in shipping. There is also evidence that Thales, a mathematician and philosopher in ancient Greece used options to secure a low price for olive presses in advance of the harvest. Thales had reason to believe the olive harvest would be particularly strong. During the off-season when demand for olive presses was almost non-existent, he acquired rights-at a very low cost-to use the presses the following spring. Later, when the olive harvest was in full-swing, Thales exercised his option and proceeded to rent the equipment to others at a much higher price.
In Holland, trading in tulip options blossomed during the early 1600s. At first, tulip dealers used call options to make sure they could secure a reasonable price to meet the demand. At the same time, tulip growers used put options to ensure an adequate selling price. However, it wasn't long before speculators joined the mix and traded the options for profit. Unfortunately, when the market crashed, many speculators failed to honor their agreements. The consequences for the economy were devastating. Not surprisingly, the situation in this unregulated market seriously tainted the view most people had of options. After a similar episode in London one hundred years later, options were even declared illegal.

Early Options in America: options appeared on the scene around the same time as stocks. In the early 19th Century, call and put contracts — known as "privileges" — were not traded on an exchange. Because the terms differed for each contract, there wasn't much in the way of a secondary market. Instead, it was up to the buyers and sellers to find each other. This was typically accomplished when firms offered specific calls and puts in newspaper ads.
Not unlike what happened in Holland and England, options came under heavy scrutiny after the Great Depression. Although the Investment Act of 1934 legitimized options, it also put trading under the watchful eye of the newly formed Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
For the next several decades, growth in option trading remained slow. By 1968, annual volume still didn't exceed 300,000 contracts.
For the most part, early over-the-counter options failed to attract a following because they were cumbersome and illiquid. In the absence of an exchange, all trades were done by phone. To make matters worse, investors had no way of knowing what the real market for a given contract was. Instead, the put-call dealer functioned only to match the buyer and seller. Operating without a fixed commission, the dealer simply kept the spread between the price paid and the price sold. There was no limit to the size of this spread. Worse yet, all option contracts had to be exercised in person. If the holder of the option somehow missed the 3:15 pm deadline, the option would expire worthless regardless of its intrinsic value.

Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT): In the late 1960s, as exchange volume for commodities began to shrink, the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) explored opportunities for diversification into the options market. Joseph W. Sullivan, Vice President of Planning for the CBOT, studied the over-the-counter option market and concluded that two key ingredients for success were missing. First, Sullivan believed that existing options had too many variables. To correct this, he proposed standardizing the strike price, expiration, size, and other relevant contract terms. Second, Sullivan recommended the creation of an intermediary to issue contracts and guarantee settlement and performance. This intermediary is now known as the Options Clearing Corporation.
To replace the put-call dealers, who served only as intermediaries, the CBOT created a system in which market makers were required to provide two-sided markets. At the same time, the presence of multiple market makers made for a competitive atmosphere in which buyers and sellers alike could be assured of getting the best possible price.

Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE): After four years of study and planning, the Chicago Board of Trade established the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) and began trading listed call options on 16 stocks on April 26, 1973. The CBOE's first home was actually a smoker's lounge at the Chicago Board of Trade. After achieving first-day volume of 911 contracts, the average daily volume skyrocketed to over 20,000 the following year. Along the way, the new exchange achieved several important milestones.
As the number of underlying stocks with listed options doubled to 32, exchange membership doubled from 284 to 567. About the same time, new laws opened the door for banks and insurance companies to include options in their portfolios. For these reasons, option volume continued to grow. By the end of 1974, average daily volume exceeded 200,000 contracts.
The newfound interest in options also caught the attention of the nation's newspapers, which voluntarily began carrying listed option prices. That's quite an accomplishment considering that the CBOE initially had to purchase news space in The Wall Street Journal in order to publish quotes.

Other Exchanges Get Into the Game: Starting in 1975, a number of other exchanges began trading listed options. This group included the American Stock Exchange (AMEX), the Pacific Stock Exchange (PSE), and what is now known as the Philadelphia Stock Exchange (PHE). The most recent player to enter the game is the International Stock Exchange (ISE). Although the ISE only trades options on a limited number of stocks, the list is literally growing every day. Today, options on all sorts of financial instruments are also traded at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the CBOT, and other exchanges.

About me

  • Visitor Tracker - Since Mar 11, 2006
  • Powered by Blogger
    and Santosh Jena